SUMMARY TABLE OF CONTENTS
I.
INTRODUCTION. 2
1. What is “law”? 3
2. In particular, what is “the common law”? 5
3. How is the judicial
system organized? 15
4. How is legislative activity organized? 24
5. Are legal methods static,
or have they varied over time, as society and its legal institutions have
developed? 31
II. THE AGE OF DISCOVERY..... 37
A. INITIAL ENCOUNTERS 37
(1) A First Exercise in
Statutory Construction 37
(2) A First Case ─
Swift v. Tyson 41
B. COMMON-LAW COURTS ENCOUNTERING NEW ISSUES.. 51
C. THE EFFECT OF A
PRECEDENT ON A SUBSEQUENT CASE.... 73
D. SYNTHESIS.... 85
III. THE AGE OF FAITH........ 105
A. DEVELOPING PRODUCT LIABILITY 105
B. ON WRONGFUL DEATH AND THE RELATION BETWEEN
THE COMMON LAW AND STATUTES.. 116
C. WORKPLACE SAFETY AND THE
RAILROADS.. 126
THE FEDERAL RAILROAD SAFETY
APPLIANCES ACT OF 1893........... 140
THREE SAFETY APPLIANCES ACT
PROBLEMS........... 142
LEGISLATIVE BACKGROUND TO
THE FEDERAL RAILWAY SAFETY
APPLIANCES ACT 144
1. Presidential messages........... 144
2. House of Representatives
Committee Report........... 146
3. Senate Debates........... 153
THE INTERSTATE COMMERCE
COMMISSION AND IMPLEMENTATION OF THE RAILWAY SAFETY APPLIANCES ACT........... 190
THE COURTS ENCOUNTER THE
RSA 205
IV. THE AGE OF ANXIETY........ 241
A. THE LIMITS OF FORMALISM.. 241
B. THE PRODUCT LIABILITY/WARRANTY SYNTHESIS
THROUGH THE 30'S.. 252
C. FURTHER ON A SAFE WORKPLACE, WRONGFUL DEATH,
AND THE USES OF STATUTES.. 293
(1) Changing Legal Institutions. 293
(2) Changing Judicial Approaches to Statutory
Materials. 298
(3) The Place of Custom 311
(4) Reconciling Statutory and Judicially-Created Remedies in the
Workplace 314
D. THE SUPREME COURT ADJUSTS ITS ROLE IN
RESPECT OF (STATE) COMMON LAW .. 331
E. THE SUPREME COURT ADJUSTS ITS ROLE IN
RESPECT OF STATUTES AND THEIR
INTERPRETATION.. 338
NOTES ON POST NEW-DEAL
STATUTORY INTERPRETATION 349
(1) What the Legislators
Meant 352
NOTES
ON THE EVALUATION OF LEGISLATIVE HISTORY..... 361
(2) What the Words Mean 365
(3) Statutes-in-Context 374
NOTES ON ADMINISTRATIVE
AGENCY INTERPRETATION........... 386
F. A QUARTET OF THEORETICAL WRITINGS..... 391
IV. MODERN TIMES........ 411
A. FURTHER ON THE QUESTION OF PRODUCT
LIABILITY 411
B. CONTEMPORARY STATUTORY INTERPRETATION – THE
NEW TEXTUALISM AND THE FEE REIMBURSEMENT PROBLEM.. 450
1. Setting the Context – Attorney Fee
Reimbursement for the Parents of Children Wrongly Denied Special Care by Their
School Board 457
2. Congress Responds to Smith 480
I. Hearings........... 482
II. S. 415........... 483
III. H.R. 1523........... 500
IV. Conference Report........... 516
3. The Judicial/Legislative Dialogue Continues 527
4. The Problem Solved? 560
5. Modern Scholarly
Writings About the Interpretation Problem 569
a. Historical perspectives........... 570
b. Scholars (and scholar-judges) associated
with Law and Economics........... 573
c. Textualists........... 579
d. Purposivists........... 593
6. Recent Supreme Court
Efforts – Resolution? 617
C. MORE ON THE PROBLEM OF
AGENCY INTERPRETATION OF STATUTES.. 654
D. WHAT’S A JUDGE TO DO?.. 677